No Scores Yet
Relative Brier Score
0
Forecasts
0
Upvotes
Forecasting Calendar
| Past Week | Past Month | Past Year | This Season | All Time | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Forecasts | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
| Comments | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Questions Forecasted | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Upvotes on Comments By This User | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| Definitions | |||||
Why do you think you're right?
- Nvidia is falling behind Microsoft and Apple, who have more diversified models.
- The market has already up-priced AI a lot, limiting further growth.
- High expextations from the company can lead to underdelivers from their part.
- Nvidias valuation is reliant on the demand for AI which can with time normalize.
- There are a lot o macroeconomic uncertainties that can favore companies like Apple
Why might you be wrong?
- Nvidia is the center of the AI revolution
- It has shown that it is capable of reaching the top like it has already overtaken bigger corps.
- There are AI breakthroughs and partnerships that can boost investor confidence.
- Bullish forecasts says Nvidia will reach $5T by 2026
Why do you think you're right?
The economic and diplomatic risks are a big factors. Getting more sanctions from China and Russia will probably discourage testing.
Missle launches and threats are a strategic alternative, they can achieve deterrence without actual detonation.
Kim’s Long-Term Plan has to avoiding unnecessary risks. This means that nuclear test which is a high-risk move, that could provoke military responses or preemptive strikes, is a bad idea.
North Korea is focusing on modernization creating an emphasis on AI, space programs, and drone warfare. This suggests a shift in military priorities.
Why might you be wrong?
North Korea often bluffs with things like this but their unpredictability can lead Kim to do a test if he finds it necessary for internal power or diplomacy.
The last nuclear test predictions have been wrong. In between the intelligence gaps Pyongyang can be hiddin the preparations for this test.
If there is a geopolitical shift and Russia and China offer diplomatic cover, North Korea may feel threatened and decide to take action.
There are historical patterns that we need to take into consideration, past tests happen with little to no warning, which is a possability for today.
Why do you think you're right?
Why might you be wrong?