This is a probably no situation: The estimated frontier threshold (10²⁶-10²⁷) is being discussed, so it’s plausible we’ll cross it — and before mid-2027 is possible given current trajectories.
No Scores Yet
Relative Brier Score
0
Forecasts
0
Upvotes
Forecasting Calendar
| Past Week | Past Month | Past Year | This Season | All Time | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Forecasts | 0 | 2 | 22 | 21 | 37 |
| Comments | 0 | 2 | 13 | 13 | 20 |
| Questions Forecasted | 0 | 2 | 7 | 6 | 14 |
| Upvotes on Comments By This User | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Definitions | |||||
Why do you think you're right?
Why might you be wrong?
“U.S. or non-U.S. entity” is broad — so it simply means someone, somewhere, not necessarily a U.S. lab. That raises the probability somewhat, since it doesn’t restrict geo.
Why do you think you're right?
Estimating a probability for U.S. entities crossing ≥ 10²⁷ FLOPs by the deadline (by 31 May 2027)
Given the info, I’d frame a subjective probabilistic estimate along these lines:
• Given that the top confirmed run is ~5 × 10²⁶ FLOPs, there is a gap (a factor of ~2) before hitting the 10²⁷ threshold.
• But the trend is sharply upward, and many models may be in “stealth” (i.e. unpublished compute) or underreported.
• The U.S. labs (OpenAI, xAI, etc.) have strong incentives, resources, and momentum to push the frontier.
So balancing the evidence, I’d put the probability for a U.S.-based entity having trained a model ≥ 10²⁷ FLOPs by May 2027 at somewhere in the 30 % to 50 % range, leaning toward the lower side given no public confirmation yet.
Why might you be wrong?
Joint Probability
Since U.S. and non-U.S. probabilities are not mutually exclusive, we don’t add them — it’s possible both will cross ≥ 10²⁷ FLOPs by the deadline.
• Probability at least one (U.S. or non-U.S.) crosses ≥ 10²⁷ FLOPs by May 2027:
• Using independence approximation:
P(\text{≥10²⁷ by any}) ≈ 1 - (1 - 0.40)(1 - 0.20) ≈ 52 %
So there’s roughly a 50–50 chance globally that we see a model trained at or above 10²⁷ FLOPs by mid-2027.
Why do you think you're right?
legislation is slowing us down ATM
Why might you be wrong?
AI is developing quite rapidly