autechre

About:
Show more
Forecasting Activity
Forecasting Calendar
No forecasts in the past 3 months
 

Past Week Past Month Past Year This Season All Time
Forecasts 0 0 10 10 17
Comments 0 0 4 4 8
Questions Forecasted 0 0 6 6 7
Upvotes on Comments By This User 0 0 0 0 0
 Definitions
New Prediction
autechre
made their 3rd forecast (view all):
This forecast expired on Jul 29, 2025 04:00PM
Probability
Answer
Forecast Window
90% (0%)
Yes
Apr 29, 2025 to Oct 29, 2026
10% (0%)
No
Apr 29, 2025 to Oct 29, 2026
Why do you think you're right?

Confirming previous forecast

Files
Why might you be wrong?

Confirming previous forecast


Files
New Prediction
Confirmed previous forecast
Files
New Badge
autechre
earned a new badge:

Active Forecaster

New Prediction
autechre
made their 3rd forecast (view all):
Probability
Answer
0% (0%)
Less than or equal to 59
0% (0%)
Between 60 and 69, inclusive
0% (0%)
Between 70 and 79, inclusive
10% (0%)
Between 80 and 89, inclusive
90% (0%)
More than or equal to 90
Confirmed previous forecast
Files
New Prediction
Why do you think you're right?

While synthesis specific is not necessary, if we can synthesize more complex proteins (and this is my prediction w.r.t. >400 amino acid question) then it would be more feasible to make biological agents that target a specific system. It doesn't have to be a specific group in the human population, it could target agricultural systems (the former would be quite more risky than the latter). Vaccines are made ahead of time before deployment and its distribution controlled away from an adversary, requiring the adversary to expend resources into manufacturing its own vaccines or steal / reverse-engineer it.

Chemicals are simpler to make but lack the same level of specificity.

Files
Why might you be wrong?

Files
New Badge
autechre
earned a new badge:

Active Forecaster

New Prediction
Why do you think you're right?

We're only a few stages close in the tech tree. Dependent technologies would include:

  - Artificial Intelligence and misc. RL / ML techniques are perfectly suited for solving non-linear problems such as the arrangement of amino-acids into functional proteins. First of all, systems like Alphafold already demonstrate the effectiveness of such techniques, despite its issues with "hallucinating" protein folds. My hunch is that "hallucination" is a general problem and not something specific to ML-based protein-folding predictors; so the attention towards reducing error-rate in i.e. LLMs would be quickly re-applicable towards making protein-folding predictors more reliable.


- Demonstrated implementation of control systems for stabilizing nano-scale material: I recall reading a paper (can't recall the title) where the scientists used RL (or some other ML technique) to arrange gallium(?) atoms with a (SEM or STM?) microscope. The general principle is that it can be demonstrated for a ML system to create a control loop specifically adjusted for the imperfections of the environment in-which the atoms are arranged, i.e. abrasive / uneven edges of the STM needle (I think it's called?). There are also more methods that we're coming up with in order to control atomic structures. Also stuff like this: https://phys.org/news/2024-05-physicists-atoms-proximity-paving-exploring.html

- Incentive: New drugs, and a step towards nanomachines

- Compounding effect: Being able to synthesize arbitrary proteins could make it easier to build more-and-more complex proteins.

Basically tied to AI progress, which many have constantly mis-predicted so far.

Files
Why might you be wrong?

I'm not a biochemist (but that just biases me in a different way, I think specialization leads to under-predicting due to perceived difficulties of conventional techniques).

The compounding effect / asymptote might not happen within 5 years, but I'm betting it would which gives ~ +15% to my estimate.

Files
New Prediction
Why do you think you're right?

it's been a while. not likely in the next 6 months

Files
Why might you be wrong?

something really bad has to happen.

Files
New Prediction
autechre
made their 3rd forecast (view all):
This forecast expired on Feb 22, 2025 05:32AM
Probability
Answer
Forecast Window
60% (+15%)
Yes
Jan 22, 2025 to Jan 22, 2026
40% (-15%)
No
Jan 22, 2025 to Jan 22, 2026
Why do you think you're right?
deepseek, seems to be pushing results at the right pace
Files
Why might you be wrong?

fraud, "winter". benchmarks are kind of iffy.

Files
New Prediction
Confirmed previous forecast
Files
Files
Tip: Mention someone by typing @username