In a slightly unexpcted way, with its bunker-buster strike on Iranian nuclear facilities, Trump has reassured the credibility of U.S. alliance with countries like Isreal and South Korea who face nuclear threats. North Korea is unlikely to risk such a thing.
0.917133
Relative Brier Score
33
Forecasts
1
Upvotes
Forecasting Calendar
| Past Week | Past Month | Past Year | This Season | All Time | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Forecasts | 0 | 0 | 33 | 33 | 33 |
| Comments | 0 | 0 | 28 | 28 | 28 |
| Questions Forecasted | 0 | 0 | 25 | 25 | 25 |
| Upvotes on Comments By This User | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Definitions | |||||
Star Commenter - Sep 2025
Why do you think you're right?
Why might you be wrong?
North Korea could consider small attacks and harassment on South Korean assets and personnel minor incidents that will make the news without provoking a major escalation.
Why do you think you're right?
China won't make its move on Taiwan unless it has confidence that U.S. won't interfere. Current trade negotiations with Trump is among the efforts to move things in China's favor. China is also making preparations such as hiring Russian military to train its airborne troops and stocking up on maritime miliita fleets, all of which will take more than 6 months.
Why might you be wrong?
Trump could very easily grant China what they wanted to secure a "trade deal win" and dramatically lower the barrier to a military success in Taiwan for China.
Why do you think you're right?
Djibouti was a signaling effort, a show of force and intent. Further inticing Western hostility will be counterproductive. If China wishes to expand local military presence and along with it the infrastructure capacity to support it, further construction will be in the form of dual-use facilities, such as commercial ports that can support naval activities with minimum add-ons or modifications, to draw less attention and provide deniability.
Why might you be wrong?
China could be more confident, open, and demonstrative with its military and force projection efforts in the region. Therefore, the possibility of another facility built purely for military purpose cannot be ruled out.
Why do you think you're right?
Russia has insufficient military capacity to invade Moldova due to attrition from the war with Ukraine. Opening up a second front in another direction such as Georgia or Armenia would also be unwise. Invading Kazakhstan will push the country towards U.S. or China and it may destablize Sino-russian relationship since Kazakhstan is on the border of China.
Why might you be wrong?
Russia could certainly, in an unwise move and at an unreasonable cost, create a diversion for its ongoing war efforts in Ukraine.
Why do you think you're right?
Russia's typical tactic to achieve reflexive control is vague indication of escalation and verbal threats backed by limited incursions or provocations, which will lead to self-intimidation by its victims. Russia is unlikely to overdo this tactic by causing any significan loss of assets or human lives, which will be considered a de facto escalation instead of a threat to escalate.
Why might you be wrong?
Russia may decide to take on NATO directly and kinetically in an open conflict within the next 18 months, though the possibility is small. If that's the case, a cyber attack with kinetic effect (e.g., disruption of NATO logistics) may be among the pre-conflict shaping activities, which are textbook hybrid warfare maneuvers.
Why do you think you're right?
Ukraine's morale and confidence are high as they receive continued support from Europe and the U.S. Trump recently expressed positive attitude on Truth Social toward Ukraine reclaiming ALL of its territories. The U.S. has also begun to relax the constraint on Ukraine striking targets within Russian borders with U.S. weapons. Russia's war machine is grinding at a high human cost and cost to its civilian economy. In the face of these positive prospects, Ukraine is unlikely to concede prematurely to signing any peace agreement.
Why do you think you're right?
Very unlikely before the end of the conflict between Israel and Hamas and a resolution of Gaza situation, which is likely to take more than 6 months. Any Muslim-majority country that attempts at such a thing will be ostracized by the community.
Why might you be wrong?
The end of the Gaza conflict between Israel and Hamas could be sooner and achieved within 6 months, laying the ground for further normalization of relationship between Israel and other Muslim-majority countries.