With top US officials pulling out of the Russia-Ukraine ceasefire talks in London, a short-term ceasefire scenario seems much more distant. I believe Russia feels much more comfortable negotiating this agreement with President Trump's team than with the leaders of the European Union.
0.178135
Relative Brier Score
30
Forecasts
3
Upvotes
Forecasting Calendar
| Past Week | Past Month | Past Year | This Season | All Time | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Forecasts | 0 | 0 | 30 | 30 | 30 |
| Comments | 0 | 0 | 25 | 25 | 25 |
| Questions Forecasted | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 | 9 |
| Upvotes on Comments By This User | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| Definitions | |||||
Power Forecaster - Apr 2025
Star Commenter - Apr 2025
Why do you think you're right?
Why might you be wrong?
It's possible that American negotiators will withdraw to give European leaders the space to reach agreements with Russia on regional issues, and once they've reached agreement, the US will bolster the conclusion of a deal.
Why do you think you're right?
In recent weeks of the Russia-Ukraine War, President Putin has launched bombing raids on the capital, kyiv, raising his stakes in keeping the conflict active. These events push back the possibility of a ceasefire in the short term. Even if a ceasefire were achieved, it would not last more than 30 days. Ukrainian society is wounded and has demonstrated for more than three years since the Russian invasion began that it will resist. A single shot is needed to end a ceasefire. This is a conflict that can only find a ceasefire if Russia withdraws entirely from Ukrainian territory, which seems absolutely impossible.
Why might you be wrong?
Expect the unexpected. There's always the possibility that President Putin will decide to withdraw his troops from Ukrainian territory. What happens if the military leadership stops sharing Putin's vision of an imperialist Russia? What happens if Russian youth begin to organize and demonstrate in protest against the war? What happens if the Russian olympia breaks away from political power due to fatigue from having its international assets confiscated?
Why do you think you're right?
I believe the conditions for a bilateral ceasefire will not be met this summer. Despite talks between Russia and the US, in which a principle of dialogue was established that would prohibit further attacks on Ukraine's energy infrastructure, Russia has consistently violated these initial agreements and has even increased its attacks on the civilian population in kyiv.
Therefore, if a bilateral ceasefire agreement could be reached, I believe it would be in the last quarter of the year.
Why might you be wrong?
Pressure from the US, and eventually from other US nations, is likely to lead Zelensky to agree to a cease-fire this summer. This is a formal, rather than a sustainable, act of substance, but one that allows the US to present a media victory.
Why do you think you're right?
I doubt Venezuela will make a formal statement relinquishing its claim on Essequibo. However, I believe they will let the issue go unnoticed. Maduro is experiencing perhaps his greatest political crisis, with an economic and humanitarian crisis within the nation. Additionally, the US maintains support for Guyana's territorial integrity, so Maduro knows the issue could escalate to dimensions that would cost him his permanence in the already weakened government.
Why might you be wrong?
However, an authoritarian leader like Maduro can have irrational reactions, which can materialize with armed attacks using guerrilla warfare or sabotage.