128th
Accuracy Rank

vonT

About:
Show more

No Scores Yet

Relative Brier Score

0

Forecasts

0

Upvotes
Forecasting Activity
Forecasting Calendar
 

Past Week Past Month Past Year This Season All Time
Forecasts 0 0 43 43 43
Comments 0 0 44 44 44
Questions Forecasted 0 0 17 17 17
Upvotes on Comments By This User 0 0 4 4 4
 Definitions
New Prediction
Why do you think you're right?
There have only been five occurrences of more than 100 casualties. This late in the question, it's not likely to occur.
Files
Why might you be wrong?

Misunderstandings or a miscalculation could rapidly spiral. Even if resolved quickly, the incident may cross the threshold of 100 uniformed casualties. 

Files
New Prediction
Why do you think you're right?

Since the armistice in 1953, there have been four major US troop reductions in ROK. The first was the immediate draw down while the subsequent three were during the Vietnam and Iraq Wars. Also, removing a BCT sized element from ROK (about 20% of total US forces on pen) would be significant geopolitical event. It may embolden PRC, DPRK, and RUS to try more aggressive actions in the region. Equally it would probably have a chilling effect on ROK and JPN, undermining their confidence in the US. Threatening in private to reduce troops may be a negotiating tactic of the administration but saying it publicly--even if they're just "considering" the action--is probably less effective.

Files
Why might you be wrong?
Since January the US has not been afraid to bully allies with threats and actions that run contrary to post war norms. The administration has actively prioritized homeland defense over forward basing. Stationing troops back in the homeland could be spun as a cost saving measure (despite the ROK contributing signficant money to the costs of stationing troops).
Files
New Badge
vonT
earned a new badge:

Active Forecaster

New Prediction
vonT
made their 4th forecast (view all):
Probability
Answer
0% (0%)
Less than or equal to 1349
0% (-40%)
Between 1350 and 1499, inclusive
100% (+40%)
Between 1500 and 1649, inclusive
0% (0%)
Between 1650 and 1799, inclusive
0% (0%)
More than or equal to 1800
Why do you think you're right?
9 Cases in 12 day is reasonable given monthly rates.
Files
Why might you be wrong?
Adjustments in counts could keep us below the 1500 mark. Unlikely.
Files
New Badge
vonT
earned a new badge:

Star Commenter - Aug 2025

Earned for making 5+ comments in a month (rationales not included).
New Prediction
vonT
made their 5th forecast (view all):
Probability
Answer
0% (0%)
Less than or equal to 500
0% (0%)
Between 501 and 750, inclusive
0% (-40%)
Between 751 and 1000, inclusive
100% (+40%)
Between 1001 and 1250, inclusive
0% (0%)
More than or equal to 1251
Why do you think you're right?

There's not sign of incidents slowing down over the past week. The average daily rate for this month would put us into the 1200's. Even a low rate would cross 1000 total. To break 1250, the average daily number of incidents would need to be 42.2 since 22 Aug. In August so far there have only been 5 days greater than that. Roughly 25% chance of a given day being over 42 and every day that isn't the bar gets higher. 

Files
Why might you be wrong?

Without tracking the daily news closely, it is hard to know if there was a one-off event or other incident that may have caused a substantial spike. A single day above 62 (or two days above 50) would allow the monthly average of 40 to break 1250. Unlikely, but possible. 

Files
New Prediction
vonT
made their 2nd forecast (view all):
Probability
Answer
0% (0%)
Less than 600
0% (0%)
Between 600 and 629, inclusive
40% (+30%)
Between 630 and 659, inclusive
55% (-15%)
Between 660 and 689, inclusive
5% (-15%)
More than or equal to 690
Why do you think you're right?
Average daily incidents for the most recent week were about 18, below the 23 incidents a day needed. In the final week, there'd have to be about 26 incidents a day on average to cross 690. It's possible, but I'm lowering the chances substantially. Playing the averages puts us even closer to staying below 650 than before. Still think it more likely than not they cross the 660 mark, but much less likely they go over 690.
Files
Why might you be wrong?
Playing the averages puts us right on the dividing line. It's as much a judgement call as a numbers game when the math puts you right on the line. There's certainly more sophisticated models that can be run, but at a certain point you play the people not the cards. 
Files
New Prediction
vonT
made their 2nd forecast (view all):
Probability
Answer
0% (0%)
Less than 250
0% (0%)
Between 250 and 349, inclusive
0% (-43%)
Between 350 and 449, inclusive
97% (+40%)
Between 450 and 549, inclusive
3% (+3%)
More than or equal to 550
Why do you think you're right?

Count is nearly 500, with about 16 incidents a day since last adjustment. We're still lagging the yearly average incidents per day, but slightly higher than the August average of 14. If the trend holds we stay under 550. 

Files
Why might you be wrong?

The margin for error is pretty small even with only two days left. There is a chance that this can still happen in the final day and go over 550.

Files
New Prediction
vonT
made their 1st forecast (view all):
Probability
Answer
0%
Less than 600
0%
Between 600 and 629, inclusive
10%
Between 630 and 659, inclusive
70%
Between 660 and 689, inclusive
20%
More than or equal to 690
Why do you think you're right?

Coming late to this and following the crowd and the trend...and taking a bit of a swing for score purposes. A 15 day average of 21 and a 30 day average of 23 events a day gives a range of 655-689 for August. I tend to bias towards the more pessimistic outcome which tracks with the crowds' reasoning as well. Going north of 690 is more likely but still requires an increase in daily average over the past month. 

Files
Why might you be wrong?

I'm assuming a general increase in incidents overall this year will break on the high side.  Also, the 15 and 30 day averages are only that, averages. They do not account for major events that may cause spikes or drops in incidents. 

Files
New Prediction
vonT
made their 3rd forecast (view all):
Probability
Answer
0% (-1%)
Less than or equal to 1349
40% (+3%)
Between 1350 and 1499, inclusive
60% (+19%)
Between 1500 and 1649, inclusive
0% (-20%)
Between 1650 and 1799, inclusive
0% (-1%)
More than or equal to 1800
Why do you think you're right?

With just over a month to go we have over 1400 cases. The average number of cases per week for the year is 42. Over the last three months it is about 18. With five weeks to go the weekly average would put us a hair under 1499. Anything close to the full year's weekly average and it will cross the 1500 mark. Effectively we are looking at one moderate outbreak to put us over the 1500. With schools starting back up, it is reasonable to expect some increase in cases that would push the weekly average above 20.

Files
Why might you be wrong?

The more recent, 12 week average puts us below 1500 cases. If the next two weeks indicate a lower-than-expected cases, then I will probably reverse the percentages. A less likely possibility is that any major outbreak could rapidly spread and go above 1650. 

Files
Files
Tip: Mention someone by typing @username