Since the armistice in 1953, there have been four major US troop reductions in ROK. The first was the immediate draw down while the subsequent three were during the Vietnam and Iraq Wars. Also, removing a BCT sized element from ROK (about 20% of total US forces on pen) would be significant geopolitical event. It may embolden PRC, DPRK, and RUS to try more aggressive actions in the region. Equally it would probably have a chilling effect on ROK and JPN, undermining their confidence in the US. Threatening in private to reduce troops may be a negotiating tactic of the administration but saying it publicly--even if they're just "considering" the action--is probably less effective.
No Scores Yet
Relative Brier Score
0
Forecasts
0
Upvotes
Forecasting Calendar
| Past Week | Past Month | Past Year | This Season | All Time | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Forecasts | 0 | 0 | 43 | 43 | 43 |
| Comments | 0 | 0 | 44 | 44 | 44 |
| Questions Forecasted | 0 | 0 | 17 | 17 | 17 |
| Upvotes on Comments By This User | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Definitions | |||||
Why do you think you're right?
Why might you be wrong?
Why do you think you're right?
Why might you be wrong?
Star Commenter - Aug 2025
Why do you think you're right?
There's not sign of incidents slowing down over the past week. The average daily rate for this month would put us into the 1200's. Even a low rate would cross 1000 total. To break 1250, the average daily number of incidents would need to be 42.2 since 22 Aug. In August so far there have only been 5 days greater than that. Roughly 25% chance of a given day being over 42 and every day that isn't the bar gets higher.
Why might you be wrong?
Without tracking the daily news closely, it is hard to know if there was a one-off event or other incident that may have caused a substantial spike. A single day above 62 (or two days above 50) would allow the monthly average of 40 to break 1250. Unlikely, but possible.
Why do you think you're right?
Why might you be wrong?
Why do you think you're right?
Count is nearly 500, with about 16 incidents a day since last adjustment. We're still lagging the yearly average incidents per day, but slightly higher than the August average of 14. If the trend holds we stay under 550.
Why might you be wrong?
The margin for error is pretty small even with only two days left. There is a chance that this can still happen in the final day and go over 550.
Why do you think you're right?
Coming late to this and following the crowd and the trend...and taking a bit of a swing for score purposes. A 15 day average of 21 and a 30 day average of 23 events a day gives a range of 655-689 for August. I tend to bias towards the more pessimistic outcome which tracks with the crowds' reasoning as well. Going north of 690 is more likely but still requires an increase in daily average over the past month.
Why might you be wrong?
I'm assuming a general increase in incidents overall this year will break on the high side. Also, the 15 and 30 day averages are only that, averages. They do not account for major events that may cause spikes or drops in incidents.
Why do you think you're right?
With just over a month to go we have over 1400 cases. The average number of cases per week for the year is 42. Over the last three months it is about 18. With five weeks to go the weekly average would put us a hair under 1499. Anything close to the full year's weekly average and it will cross the 1500 mark. Effectively we are looking at one moderate outbreak to put us over the 1500. With schools starting back up, it is reasonable to expect some increase in cases that would push the weekly average above 20.
Why might you be wrong?
The more recent, 12 week average puts us below 1500 cases. If the next two weeks indicate a lower-than-expected cases, then I will probably reverse the percentages. A less likely possibility is that any major outbreak could rapidly spread and go above 1650.
Why do you think you're right?
Why might you be wrong?
Misunderstandings or a miscalculation could rapidly spiral. Even if resolved quickly, the incident may cross the threshold of 100 uniformed casualties.