Updating because time window for event to occur is narrowing.
No Scores Yet
Relative Brier Score
0
Forecasts
0
Upvotes
Forecasting Calendar
| Past Week | Past Month | Past Year | This Season | All Time | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Forecasts | 0 | 0 | 35 | 35 | 35 |
| Comments | 0 | 0 | 37 | 37 | 37 |
| Questions Forecasted | 0 | 0 | 31 | 31 | 31 |
| Upvotes on Comments By This User | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| Definitions | |||||
Power Forecaster - Sep 2025
Star Commenter - Sep 2025
Why do you think you're right?
Why might you be wrong?
If the reasoning for my initial forecast was incorrect, it would still have a residual effect on my updated forecast.
Why do you think you're right?
Why might you be wrong?
Why do you think you're right?
The baseline rate of deployment to Africa is a little more than 1 deployment a year, or 0.33 deployments every four months (the time frame for this question), since it appears that Wagner Group and/or the Africa Corps have deployed to ten countries in the last approximately 9 years. However, this rate appears not just to Togo, but to any African country, and the forecast should be revised downward as a result, I believe.
Why might you be wrong?
I may be underestimating the likelihood of deployment to Togo because I'm not sufficiently considering how recent political or military developments in Togo may might deployment more likely.
Why do you think you're right?
North Korea has conducted 6 nuclear tests from 2006-2025, a time period of approximately 20 years. If the timing of these tests was random, I calculate that there would be a 15% chance that another test would occur in the next 6 months. Since no tests have occurred in the past 8 years, it seems highly likely that the timing is not random and various factors are reducing the likelihood of a North Korean test in recent years. Therefore, I am reducing my forecast likelihood from the overall baseline.
Why might you be wrong?
My forecast is based on a basic quantitative/temporal analysis, rather than detailed analysis of current political and security conditions in North Korea and regionally.
Why do you think you're right?
There are already 69 cases identified, with only less than a month to go to add to the tally. It seems unlikely that there will be 11 more cases in that time frame.
Why might you be wrong?
If the identified cases tend to cluster in certain months, there might be a greater probability that a large number of cases could be identified in the remainder of September.
Why do you think you're right?
Why might you be wrong?
Recent historical experience may not be a good guide, if recent coups were driven by one-off aggregating factors (such as a once-in-a-generation economic recession).
You are very welcome, and thank you for elaborating.
My 2 cents: the article was not wrong; but when it was written back in April 2024, with 2 recent successful coups (July & August 2023), the situation looked arguably different than in September 2025.
According to the VoA data (which are considered something of a "gold standard"), we did indeed have 9 successful coups in Africa, from 2020 to 2023 (and none since): https://projects.voanews.com/african-coups/
Why do you think you're right?
Why might you be wrong?
The federal elections in Germany earlier in 2025 may have caused disinformation cases to spike, meaning that the probability of an outcome in these higher ranges should have been increased.
Why do you think you're right?
There is little time left in this forecast window for more than one major hurricane to make landfall.
Why might you be wrong?
If hurricane landfall probability is not independent, this might increase probability of more than 1 making landfall somewhat.