2.931119
Relative Brier Score
67
Forecasts
1
Upvotes
Forecasting Calendar
| Past Week | Past Month | Past Year | This Season | All Time | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Forecasts | 10 | 10 | 67 | 67 | 84 |
| Comments | 2 | 2 | 13 | 13 | 15 |
| Questions Forecasted | 10 | 10 | 14 | 14 | 20 |
| Upvotes on Comments By This User | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Definitions | |||||
Why do you think you're right?
Recognition patterns among G20 members have been relatively stable for years. Most Western G20 states that have not recognized Palestine—such as the U.S., U.K., Japan, Germany, France, and Italy—are unlikely to shift positions abruptly due to diplomatic alignment with the U.S. and concerns about the peace-process framework. Meanwhile, countries that were already inclined to recognize Palestine—such as South Africa, Brazil, Argentina, Russia, China, Indonesia, Türkiye, and Saudi Arabia—have largely done so. Given the geopolitical constraints and the slow pace of policy change among remaining holdouts, large shifts in recognition before early 2026 are improbable.
Why might you be wrong?
A major regional development—such as a breakthrough ceasefire, a new peace initiative endorsed by major powers, or a coordinated EU policy shift—could prompt multiple G20 states to recognize Palestine in a short window. Domestic political changes, especially in Europe, could also accelerate recognition if new governments adopt more pro-recognition platforms. Additionally, unexpected global pressure following humanitarian crises could force rapid diplomatic realignment.