I'll start off low, but a little higher than the crowd as I don't know enough to be confidently lower. As per recent comments, it seems progress is not being made fast enough for this to happen within the resolution time of this question.
-0.00245
Relative Brier Score
5
Forecasts
0
Upvotes
Forecasting Calendar
| Past Week | Past Month | Past Year | This Season | All Time | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Forecasts | 0 | 17 | 190 | 196 | 939 |
| Comments | 0 | 15 | 157 | 162 | 336 |
| Questions Forecasted | 0 | 16 | 40 | 40 | 130 |
| Upvotes on Comments By This User | 0 | 4 | 44 | 46 | 194 |
| Definitions | |||||
Star Commenter - Dec 2025
Why do you think you're right?
Why might you be wrong?
I'm higher than the crowd as I think a lot can change rapidly during fighting.
Why do you think you're right?
Why might you be wrong?
The crowd is much lower than me. Maybe North Korea doesn't want to make waves at this point. Even if they do try to antagonize South Korea, maybe nothing will come of it.
Why do you think you're right?
Lowering to zero for this year. It seems there are serious attempts to get to a negotiated settlement, but there isn't enough time left in the year for it to happen.
Why might you be wrong?
It would be a surprise, but the way I could see it unfolding is if things are much closer than I thought. The other way might be some sort of temporary ceasefire from political pressure, but I don't think anyone is willing to exert the kind of pressure necessary to bring it about.
Why do you think you're right?
Increasing due to a recent comment by @404_NOT_FOUND . I agree that some form of blockade or partial blockade has become less unlikely and could be used as a potential bargaining chip.
Why might you be wrong?
My best guess is that, for negotiating purposes, the threat of a blockade would be better than actually running a blockade. The way I could see this actually happening would be someone tries to call the bluff and China has to do a 3 day demonstration blockade or something.
Why do you think you're right?
My read is that Israel's recognition of Somaliland will be net negative for normalizing diplomatic relations with the listed countries, so I'm lowering slightly.
Why might you be wrong?
Maybe there's hope for a diplomatic domino effect, but I don't think that was the reason for Israel's recognition.
Why do you think you're right?
Time snuck up on me. Lowering due to the lack of time left. This is a question where I wish I could have lowered more consistently over time, but this is the first chance I've had to update as time runs out, so it's going to look like a drastic change.
Why might you be wrong?
Maybe something I didn't know about will happen, but relatively few people are doing serious work over the next few days.
Why do you think you're right?
I'll move a little bit higher and toward the base rate from the crowd after news of the new North Korean submarine. I'll move higher if there are reports of an imminent test, but I haven't read anything. US intelligence has given false positives on this before, so I think it's likely warnings to come before tests.
Why might you be wrong?
The base rates are still higher than me and much higher than the crowd.