Using base rates and assuming the conflict continues at a relatively similar pace accounting for some fluctuations in either direction I think giving 10-19% a 60% chance is fair. I think there is a lesser chance of the conflict drastically dropping off as opposed to the conflict increasing.
0.015551
Relative Brier Score
7
Forecasts
0
Upvotes
Forecasting Calendar
| Past Week | Past Month | Past Year | This Season | All Time | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Forecasts | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 7 |
| Comments | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| Questions Forecasted | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 4 |
| Upvotes on Comments By This User | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Definitions | |||||
Most Active Topics:
Geopolitical Security,
Russia-Ukraine War,
Emerging Technology,
Iran: Threats & Influence
Most Active Topics:
Africa,
Russian Disinformation,
Iran Nuclear Program
Why do you think you're right?
Why might you be wrong?
If the delta of volatility related to the conflict in Ukraine increases or decreases rapidly I might have allocated too low a possibility for outside of 10-19%.
no
Although Russian military officials have been meeting with Togolese Officials the chance of a Russian presence in Togo cannot be close to the chance of a Russian presence in any new African Country, it's only one country after all. Considering Wagner/Africa Corp's current presence in Africa, it's highly likely they will become active in another African country before 2026.
Why do you think you're right?
Assuming conflict continues at a similar rate w/ a reasonable margin of error
Why might you be wrong?
Conflict is vastly exacerbated or abates